Treatment preferences for comorbid obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (PRO-CON OSA) survey: Patient and provider preferences for CPAP and/or tirzepatide. | Pepdox
Treatment preferences for comorbid obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (PRO-CON OSA) survey: Patient and provider preferences for CPAP and/or tirzepatide.
Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2026PMID: 41731227
PRO-CON OSA: Online survey (November 2024–August 2025) assessing US patient and provider treatment preferences between CPAP and tirzepatide for comorbid obesity and OSA (COBOSA) following tirzepatide's FDA approval for OSA. Characterizes treatment preference drivers including injection burden, CPAP adherence challenges, efficacy expectations, and side effect concerns. Provides patient and provider preference data critical for COBOSA treatment planning—understanding who prefers pharmacological versus device therapy and identifying target populations most likely to initiate or switch to tirzepatide for OSA management.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Approximately one of ten US adults has comorbid obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (COBOSA). Traditionally, sleep medicine management of COBOSA focused on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Recently, tirzepatide (a once-weekly injection) was approved for COBOSA after demonstrating substantial reduction of weight and OSA severity in efficacy trials. We assessed patient and provider attitudes towards these therapies for COBOSA.
METHODS: We conducted an online survey (November 2024–August 2025) targeting US adults with OSA and/or obesity (“patients”) and sleep medicine providers. The survey assessed treatment acceptability, preferences, and informational needs.
RESULTS: The analysis included 461 patients (86% with sleep apnea, 49% with COBOSA; ~5% response rate) and 114 providers. Overall, 70% of respondents found both CPAP and tirzepatide at least somewhat acceptable, with significantly different response patterns ( < .001): providers found CPAP more acceptable than tirzepatide, whereas patients rated both therapies similar. When asked to choose a preferred long-term therapy assuming equal effectiveness, patients favored tirzepatide (48% vs. 21%), while providers preferred CPAP (52% vs. 27%). Providers with experience prescribing injectable weight-loss medications were more aligned with patient views. Both groups supported combination therapy, though patients were less enthusiastic than providers (61% vs. 86%). Both groups valued a wide range of outcomes for decision making—across symptom, sleep, and cardiometabolic domains—and emphasized the importance of safety, long-term data, and costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients and providers view CPAP and/or tirzepatide as acceptable options for COBOSA, but preferences diverge. Given equipoise, comparative effectiveness trials are urgently needed to guide individualized treatment strategies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44470-025-00024-0.
Authors
Schmickl, Christopher N; Tripipitsiriwat, Athiwat; Mokhlesi, Babak; Mallampalli, Monica; Nokes, Brandon; Kundel, Vaishnavi; Page, Kathy; Finch, Christina; Donovan, Lucas; Tadros, Mira; Aysola, Ravi S; Zinchuk, Andrey; Zvenyach, Tracy; Safwan Badr, M; Patel, Sanjay R; Orr, Jeremy E; Owens, Robert L; Lindsell, Chris; Martin, Jennifer L; Malhotra, Atul